As a Hedge Against Inflation, Commercial Real Estate Investment Remains a Smart Play

 

As a Hedge Against Inflation, Commercial Real Estate Investment Remains a Smart Play

Aug 2, 2010 9:22 AM, By David J. Lynn, Ph.D., Contributing Columnist

 

In economic terms, inflation is defined as a rise in the general level of prices of goods and services in an economy over a period of time. When prices rise, each unit of currency buys fewer goods and services, eroding real consumer purchasing power. Although deflation also is a risk to the economy, moderate inflation is much more prevalent over the course of modern history.

In the long run, the most significant factor influencing inflation is the growth rate of the money supply. Inflation occurs when the nominal supply of dollars grows faster than the real demand to hold dollars. However, in the short and medium term, inflation may be largely affected by supply and demand pressures in the economy, and influenced by the relative elasticity of wages, prices, and level of interest rates.

In the U.S., inflation is estimated by calculating the rate of change of the Consumer Price Index (CPI). The CPI measures prices of a selection of goods and services purchased by a typical consumer. The magnitude of inflation — the inflation rate — is usually reported as the annualized percentage growth of the CPI Index.

Inflation outlook

Inflation rates vary from year to year [Exhibit 1]. Since 1949, the U.S. inflation rate as measured by annual change in the CPI has ranged from minus 1% in 1949 to a high of 13.1% in 1980. Over the past 60 years, the average annual inflation rate has been 3.7%.

Between 1991 and 2008, we experienced a prolonged period of low inflation with the CPI ranging between 1.6% and 3.3% annually. The average inflation during this 18-year period was 2.8%, considerably lower than in the 1970s and early 1980s.

The Federal Reserve’s monetary policies, which explicitly target maintaining low inflation, were partially responsible for this period of relative stability. Another factor was the tremendous productivity gains generated through the benefits of technology and lower costs of imported goods due to increasing global trade.

The CPI Index declined by 0.3% in 2009, just the third period of annual deflation since 1949. This data point has raised concerns about the potential for ongoing deflation, given a relatively weak economic recovery. In the near term, we believe that the outlook calls for a low inflationary environment, but we do not expect ongoing deflation. The low level of inflation is due to several factors:
•    an anemic economic recovery;
•    high unemployment;
•    deleveraging in both the business and consumer sectors;
•    high productivity;
•    low capacity utilization;
•    low cost imports from China and other emerging countries.

At the same time, we are concerned about the potential for higher inflation in the future for the following reasons:
•    record money supply;
•    record federal budget deficits ($1.5 trillion, or 10.6% of GDP);
•    record and surging national debt ($13 trillion, or 88.9% of GDP);
•    generally rising commodity prices due to demand from high-growth developing countries;
•    rising federal funds rate.

The consensus forecast from 45 leading financial institutions suggests that the inflation rate will remain low, but increase steadily over the next five years [Exhibit 2]. The consensus view is an average of a wide range of forecasts, reflecting the diversity of opinions on the topic.

Despite increased concerns of additional deflation, it is telling to note that only one of the 45 economists surveyed for the Blue Chip Financial Forecasts in July is calling for even a single quarter of deflation over the next two years. Like most observers, we believe that the pace of growth will be slow over the next year, but will be strong enough to allow prices to continue to rise.

We believe that as the global economy recovers over the next few years, demand for goods and services should climb accordingly, thereby increasing inflationary pressures. We believe it is reasonable to expect a return to the mean inflation rate over the past 20 years of approximately 3%. The significant monetary expansion in recent years could lead to even higher levels.

Effects on commercial real estate

Investors widely consider commercial real estate an asset class that can help offset the impact of inflation over the long term. In fact, that benefit is regularly cited as one of the advantages of adding real estate to a mixed-asset portfolio of investments.

Academic literature on the inflation-hedging benefits of real estate are mixed, but generally agree that private real estate is at least a partial hedge against inflation.

The ability to adjust rents over time is typically credited for real estate’s inflation-hedging benefits. Typically, robust economic growth should result in higher inflation, and therefore stronger rent growth.

The Great Recession has put downward pressure on both inflation and rents. Although empirical evidence suggests that rent growth seems to keep up with inflation over the long term, the changes in rent levels largely depend on short-term supply and demand fundamentals and lease terms.

Over the past 18 months, average rents across all property types have declined significantly faster than the inflation index. Based on our market forecasts, rent growth should outpace the inflation index as the U.S. economy recovers over the next few years, particularly in more supply-constrained markets.

David Lynn is managing director and head of U.S. research and investment strategy with ING Clarion based in New York.

As a Hedge Against Inflation, Commercial Real Estate Investment Remains a Smart Play

Weekly Economic Review (Real Estate)

Weekly Economic Summary – July 23, 2010

OVERVIEW ~ July 12 through 16 ~ The optimism that pushed the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) higher through Thursday, July 15, lost whatever power it had by Friday, July 16, when it fell more than 266 points to 10097.90. As the DJIA lost ground, interest rates also edged lower. The 10-year Treasury note, which began the week at 3.24%, fell to 2.94% at the close of the week; the HSH average 30-year mortgage rate (which includes jumbo rates) held at 4.98%; and the Freddie Mac average rate edged down to 4.57%. And, indicative of slackening confidence in our nation’s economic recovery, the dollar lost ground against the euro all week.

FOCUS ~ Analysts had been suggesting the stock markets would benefit from higher corporate earnings reports, but the belief (or, at least, hope) that improving corporate earnings data would be announced last week faded by Friday.

Instead of reigniting the markets with good news about earnings and, indeed, proving that the markets had overreacted to increased worries about the economic recovery, corporate earnings and corporate revenue reports were mostly lower than expected. By the end of Friday, all thirty stocks in the DJIA had lost value.

This can be read, in part, as a decline in confidence in stocks. Not surprisingly, the indicators that suggest what is happening in the real estate market are similarly weak. The purchase money loan applications component of the Mortgage Bankers Association indices of mortgage applications fell another 3.1% to 163.3, down 36.9% from a year ago. And the July National Association of Home Builders Market Index, measuring the relative optimism (and pessimism) among builders about the new-home market, was down 12.5% from the Association’s June reading, and 17.6% from its year-ago reading.

We have seen, on a nearly weekly basis, the inclination of this market to turn around, rising when analysts were most certain that it would continue falling, and falling when it seemed certain to rise.

The week does demonstrate one thing, however. When market conditions weaken, interest rates decline still more. Home (and other) financing simply becomes more affordable, and that fact continues to support the markets in this uncertain time.

Published in: on July 30, 2010 at 04:59  Leave a Comment  

Loan-to-Value Ratios Spike Following Wave of Reappraisals, Says Trepp

 

Loan-to-Value Ratios Spike Following Wave of Reappraisals, Says Trepp

Jul 21, 2010 11:11 AM, By Matt Valley, NREI Editor-in-Chief

 

Special servicers face a daunting task in trying to resolve billions of dollars in troubled commercial real estate loans based on new research from Trepp LLC. Of the 1,125 CMBS loans on properties that were reappraised during the first half of this year, 986 recorded loan-to-value ratios of greater than 100% largely due to falling valuations.

It’s a cause for concern because the unpaid principal balance exceeded the new property appraisals by a wide margin in many cases. The average loan-to-value ratio among the 1,125 CMBS loans in the survey sample was a whopping 160%, up from 72.7% when the loans were securitized. (The 1,125 loans total $15.4 billion in volume.)

“In many cases you really almost have no choice but to have a distressed sale of the property because the value of the loan is less than the mortgage outstanding,” says Paul Mancuso, vice president with Trepp, a New York-based commercial real estate data and analytics firm.

“The new valuations will go a long way in determining the best workout strategy for a loan. The end goal is to preserve the most value for the CMBS trust,” emphasizes Mancuso.

Rather than sell real estate assets at fire sale prices, however, many special servicers prefer to work with financially strapped borrowers to extend existing loan terms in the hope that the tide will eventually turn in their favor.

“Why are you extending a loan right now?” Macuso says rhetorically. “Because you believe that we have fundamentally reached the bottom of the market. People are almost immune to bad news right now. It can only get better. The hope is that if you extend for 12 to 24 months the fundamentals of both the property and the economic environment will have improved enough to generate positive cash flow.”

Worst performers

Not surprisingly, loans originated from 2005 through 2007 dominate the list of underwater properties. The period was characterized by inflated property valuations. For example, when a $22 million CMBS loan on the Northland Inn hotel and conference center in suburban Minneapolis was originated in 2006, the appraised value of the asset was $34.2 million. Today’s appraised value on Northland Inn— whose status is classified by Trepp as real estate owned (REO)— is just $2.5 million (see table above).

In the survey sample, 300 of the 986 loans in special servicing with loan-to-values exceeding 100% are in the retail sector, followed by multifamily (245), office (183), lodging (126) and other sectors (132). By dollar volume, the office sector has the largest concentration of loans under water ($3.59 billion), followed by retail ($3.24 billion), multifamily ($2.97 billion), and lodging ($2.1 billion).

In total, 1,097 loans in the sample lost a staggering 51% of their value, falling from $23.9 billion at securitization to $11.8 billion currently. Conversely, only 22 of the 1,125 loans in the sample experienced an appreciation in property value since the loans were securitized.

Loan-to-Value Ratios Spike Following Wave of Reappraisals, Says Trepp

General Growth Sells Management Portfolio to Jones Lang LaSalle

 

General Growth Sells Management Portfolio to Jones Lang LaSalle

Jul 15, 2010 10:22 AM, By Daniel Beaird, NREI Senior Associate Editor

General Growth Properties (NYSE: GGP) has sold the management and leasing responsibilities for its third-party management division to Jones Lang LaSalle (NYSE: JLL) as General Growth attempts to emerge from Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.

The five-year agreement calls for General Growth and JLL to share management revenues on a portfolio of 18 regional shopping malls and community centers across 11 states. The agreement is on an earn-out basis with no upfront price, and takes effect immediately.

The 200 employees comprising the management teams of the 18 properties plus 30 General Growth corporate employees will become Jones Lang LaSalle employees.

The portfolio adds more than 11 million sq. ft. to JLL’s retail portfolio of 84 million sq. ft. in the Americas and 265 million sq. ft. worldwide.

“It fits very well into our existing structure,” says Greg Maloney, president of Jones Lang LaSalle Retail, based in Atlanta. Along with the 230 employees JLL is adding, 16 new clients are also coming on board with this deal.

“The people that we’re bringing in are moving just down the street or only within a few miles from one office to another,” says Maloney. “The benefit to JLL is the new talent and new clients as this deal solidifies our position as a third-party provider of regional mall real estate in the country.”

Another benefit to JLL is any possible additional contracts that General Growth might send its way due to this alliance.

“If they decide to sell some properties, we’ll get a shot at the investment sale piece,” adds Maloney. “We are positioned to offer our services for a variety of transactions.”

Chicago-based General Growth’s third-party management arm is a separate business from the mall owner’s main processes, and therefore, wasn’t protected from bankruptcy. The alignment with JLL will allow General Growth to remove top tier management from its payroll in its efforts to reorganize.

“This strategic alliance with Jones Lang LaSalle also allows our clients to leverage the resources and talents from GGP and Jones Lang LaSalle and, ultimately, create a broader range of services for our clients,” says Tom Nolan, president and chief operating officer for General Growth.

Reorganization Plan
General Growth has filed a reorganization plan that would implement a recapitalization of between $7 billion and $8.5 billion of new capital and create two publicly traded companies. Under the plan, one group would include completed properties and the other would oversee planned communities.

GGP also landed a $500 million equity investment from the Teachers Retirement System of Texas this week in another step to help the REIT emerge from bankruptcy protection.

General Growth owns or manages more than 200 regional shopping malls in 43 states.

General Growth Sells Management Portfolio to Jones Lang LaSalle

Jones Lang Lasalle operates as a nationwide Real Estate Development, sales and consulting group. They do have an office in our marketplace of Cincinnati. They have been responsible for the marketing of several commercial building in Norwood and Middletown recently.

Industrial Sector Lags Despite Manufacturing Gains

 

Industrial Sector Lags Despite Manufacturing Gains

Jul 14, 2010 10:02 AM, By Daniel Beaird, NREI Senior Associate Editor

Widespread improvement in the industrial sector won’t occur until 2011 and 2012 despite recent economic and manufacturing gains. That is according to a new report issued by Encino, Calif.-based Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services.

While the manufacturing sector grew for the tenth consecutive month in May on the strength of new orders and production, industrial vacancies will remain elevated throughout 2010 as tenants have more space than they need. However, some industrial markets like Houston, a port city, are better positioned to rebound faster as tenant demand rises and greater employment growth is expected.

“Manufacturing continues to post gains, which will bolster a 2011 recovery in the industrial property sector,” says Alan Pontius, managing director of Marcus & Millichap’s national office and industrial properties group. “Future economic expansion will also be driven by personal and corporate spending.” Both were the primary drivers of GDP growth during the first quarter of 2010.

“As private consumption resumes, business will be encouraged to replenish depleted inventories in anticipation of further increases in demand, albeit at a slow pace,” says Pontius.

Employment growth will be a crucial component in stabilizing consumer sentiment and supporting spending, according to Marcus & Millichap. More robust economic and employment growth won’t take hold until 2011 and 2012.

As the industrial sector begins its slow rally, investors are hoping that cheaper turnover costs and growing competition for available assets will help to stabilize cap rates. Cap rates for best-of-class assets or those located in top industrial markets with credit tenants and long-term leases in place will likely end 2010 in the high-6% to mid-7% range, according to the report.

More buyers will move off the sidelines and compete for deals, while investors will demand higher returns for riskier assets in less desirable locations, Marcus & Millichap predicts. Initial yields for single-tenant properties in secondary and tertiary markets should settle in the 8% to 9% range this year.

Texas Two-Step
Houston, Los Angeles and Denver ranked as the strongest U.S. industrial markets in Marcus & Millichap’s report. The firm ranked 27 national industrial markets on various factors including projected employment changes, construction, net absorption, revenue change and vacancy.

Dallas-Fort Worth made the largest jump in the rankings, up eight spots to fifth. Meanwhile, Tampa, Atlanta and Detroit bottomed out the list.

Top-ranked Houston benefits from its port city status. Tenant demand from port traffic and modest industry growth drove Houston to the top of Marcus & Millichap’s rankings for the second consecutive year. The city’s vacancy rate is expected to dip below the 10% mark by year’s end, recording only one of a few declining vacancy rates nationwide.

However, much like other industrial sectors, Houston’s recovery is dependent on job growth. According to IHS Global Insight, an economic and financial analysis firm, the port city is expected to return to better job levels than other top industrial markets in 2011.

Another metropolitan Texas area has seen its fortunes rise in the industrial sector too as Dallas-Fort Worth cracked the top five of the report’s rankings. Vacancy in the Metroplex is still considerably higher than most top markets, ranging from 12% to 13%, but the rate only slightly exceeds the area’s long-term average. However, demand drivers have moved Dallas-Fort Worth into the top five.

The Dallas-Fort Worth area is positioned to meet future demand with the continued evolution of intermodal facilities at the Alliance Global Logistics Hub and the Dallas Logistics Hub. Employment in the region is expected to pick up by year’s end, with increased industrial leasing activity to follow. Landlords are then expected to rein in concessions.

Industrial Sector Lags Despite Manufacturing Gains

National Economic Update Mid-July 2010

Weekly Economic Summary – July 9, 2010

OVERVIEW ~ June 28 through July 2 ~ The psychology of the economic marketplace, to the extent that it can be measured, shows up in the numbers. Over the course of the week, for example, the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) fell from 10143.81 at the opening on Monday to 9640.69, presumably on growing concerns about the apparent weakness in the American economy. Until recently, it has generally been agreed that the economy would stumble forward for several months and then, at the beginning of the next year, begin to grow in a sustainable way. By Friday, however, after the release of the June employment figures, the DJIA dropped and most other data edged lower. Even the manufacturing sector, which has been one of the brightest lights in the economy in recent months, showed a weakening with the Institute of Supply Management (ISM) Index dropping from a strong 59.7 in April to 56.2 in May, and a 1.4% fall for May factory orders. In such an environment, interest rates are likely to fall, and indeed the 10-year Treasury note declined from 3.110% to 2.956%.

FOCUS ~ The employment report was treated as if it were a mid-term report card for the economy in our nation. The Thursday report of 472,000 new claims for unemployment insurance worried most investors and then the larger employment report, released Friday, caused analysts to doubt their earlier hopes for recovery and caused the markets to fall significantly.

There were 125,000 jobs lost in June. Analysts had hoped for a furthering of the positive numbers reported in the prior month. We need at least 150,000 new jobs each month to just keep up with the employment needs in our nation. In June, the economy failed even to tread water.

The unemployment rate actually declined from 9.7% to 9.5%, but this was not good news either, because the survey indicated that 652,000 capable workers had simply stopped looking for work, pulling themselves out of the so-called “labor pool.” Thus, the unemployment rate declined, not because more people found jobs, but because fewer people are looking for them.

The May employment report apparently lulled investors and analysts into a more optimistic view than it should have, largely because of the many census jobs that increased employment numbers and then swiftly fell away. A survey of American economists had resulted in a median expectation of 110,000 new jobs in June. Thus, the markets reacted strongly to the decline.

If there is any good news to be found in the week, it is the fact that overall mortgage interest rates remain even more attractive than they were before.

Economists React: June Jobs Report ‘Bereft of Good News’

 

Economists React: June Jobs Report ‘Bereft of Good News’

Jul 7, 2010 10:00 AM, By Matt Valley, NREI Editor-in-Chief

Call it a June swoon for the U.S. labor market. Total nonfarm payroll employment declined by 125,000, raising concerns about a delay in the recovery of the troubled commercial real estate market. The setback marks a stark contrast from May when payroll employment swelled by 433,000 due largely to the hiring of 411,000 temporary Census workers.

The private sector added a modest 83,000 jobs in June, but below economists’ expectations of 110,000. Private employers added 33,000 jobs in May, according to the U.S. Labor Department, below the initial estimate of 41,000.

How much of a hole does the U.S. labor market find itself in at the moment? Well, consider that through June of this year, private-sector employment has increased by 593,000, but is still 7.9 million below its December 2007 level.

The good news is that the unemployment rate fell from 9.7% in May to 9.5% in June, but economists are quick to point out that this was largely because 652,000 workers dropped out of the labor force, reducing the labor force participation rate from 65% to 64.7%. More people became discouraged and stopped looking for work.

Meanwhile, average hourly earnings and the average length of the workweek were unchanged in June, indicating that incomes have been slow to ramp up.

NREI caught up with three respected real estate economists to get their reaction to last Friday’s jobs report and what it means for commercial real estate.

Viictor Calanog

Victor Calanog, director of research, Reis: “We expected this recovery to be slow and weak, but now it’s sinking in just how tough of a grind it may be. Not long ago, the White House expected jobs to grow by 195,000 per month through 2010. The actual average monthly gains for private-sector hiring are approximately half that amount, or slightly more than 99,000 per month for the first six months of the year.

“It is useful to note, however, that job growth tends to occur in fits and starts. After the last recession ended in late 2001, job growth was negative for 15 out of the following 21 months until the economy began posting consistently positive results in October 2003. Still, given upheavals in the international economy, it is worrisome how domestic numbers continue to fall below expectations, appearing woefully bereft of good news.”

Bob Bach

Bob Bach, chief economist, Grubb & Ellis: “The June report reveals a labor market that is expanding slowly, and it confirms other recent economic reports on retail sales, manufacturing and housing showing that the recovery has lost some momentum. The reasons for this include European debt woes, the waning effects of the stimulus, lingering caution on the part of both businesses and consumers, and severe deficit problems in state and local governments.

“The odds of a double-dip recession have increased. The question is being asked more frequently in the current environment than it was a few months ago, but the jury is still out. If the economy continues to lose momentum, then a double dip is more likely. But if the economy can stabilize, even at this lower level, the recovery will remain intact. We’ll know more over the next few weeks.”

Hessam Nadji

Hessam Nadji, managing director of research services, Marcus & Millichap: “My biggest concern is that private-sector hiring is not gaining enough traction. The risk of a double-dip recession has risen mainly due to a renewed loss of confidence spurred by the EU (European Union) debt crisis, a proposed premature wide-scale austerity plan that is a sure early-recovery killer, and a sharp reversal of the yield curve, which is most concerning of all. [The spread between long-term and short-term U.S. Treasury yields has narrowed considerably of late, which tends to foretell slower economic growth.]

“This means that the commercial space recovery is delayed. The bottom will still occur in 2010, but recovery is pushed back well into 2011. Apartments are the exception. They are getting even more traction than the first quarter of 2010.”

Economists React: June Jobs Report ‘Bereft of Good News’

National Flood Insurance Program Extended-Update

 

National Flood Insurance Program Extended until Sept. 30

July 2, 2010

Another real estate victory was achieved June 30, 2010 when Congress passed the National Flood Insurance Program Extension Act of 2010 (HR 5569), reauthorizing the extension of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) until September 30, 2010.

The bill is retroactive and covers the “lapse period” that began June 1, 2010, thereby allowing any stalled transactions to move forward.

Any new policy applications or renewals that were signed and submitted during the lapsed period will be effective from the date of application.  In the case of waiting periods, the waiting period will start from the date of application.

About the National Flood Insurance Program

The NFIP provides flood insurance to homeowners in participating communities in flood-prone areas, who could not otherwise obtain coverage due to cost or ineligibility. Without insurance provided through NFIP, property owners in federally designated areas across more than 10,000 communities nationwide (including areas throughout the Cincinnati region and Southwest Ohio ) could not obtain mortgages.

The NFIP also produces the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), which are critical for the transaction of properties located in, or adjacent to, a floodplain. If these maps are not updated regularly, the information may be incorrect and a buyer may be unaware that a property is at an increased risk for flooding.

Additional Background and Issue Summary

Natural disasters, such as hurricanes, floods, and earthquakes, are devastating for communities and individuals, and are costly to insurers, and state and federal governments.

Insurers have responded to the costs of recent natural disasters by raising premiums or declining to write policies in disaster prone areas. Without a greater government role in property insurance, many homeowners and potential home buyers may not be able to obtain insurance coverage.

As a result, there may not be sufficient resources or coverage in many parts of the country to help homeowners and their communities recover from future natural disasters.

Taxed credit closing date Extended passed!!!!! just released

Congress — both the U.S. House and Senate — passed the

Homebuyer Assistance and Improvement Act of 2010 (HR 5623), which extends the

Closing Deadline for Homebuyer-Tax-Credit eligible transactions to

September 30, 2010 (instead of June 30). 

This extension of the Closing Deadline

applies only to transactions with ratified contracts in place as of April 30, 2010 but not yet closed. 

Up to 180,000 homebuyers nationwide (including approx. 8,500 in Ohio) would have lost their tax credit had Congress not passed this extension.

 

What happened

The Senate approved the legislation – by

unanimous consent – last night at 9:40 pm.

 

The House approved the legislation on Tuesday, June 29 by a vote of

409-5.

 

The legislation provides a seamless transition.  There is no “gap” between June 30 and the time when the bill will be signed into law by President Obama (likely to occur today).

 

Government Affairs staff from the National Association of REALTORS® worked vigorously with Congressional leaders on both sides of the political spectrum to get this legislation enacted.  The impact of

RPAC does work!

Tax Credit Closing date extension update (new)

 

Here is the most recent update regarding the

Homebuyer Tax Credit and possible extension of the June 30

th Closing Deadline.

 

What has happened

The United States House of Representatives passed today (June 29) HR 5623 – the

Homebuyer Assistance and Improvement Act of 2010 – by a vote of

409-5.

 

The bill would extend the deadline for closing tax-credit-eligible transactions from June 30 to September 30, 2010.

 

What’s next

The National Association of REALTORS® (NAR) has worked vigorously to get the Closing Deadline extended. 

With this victory in the House, the bill now moves to the Senate where the outcome is much less certain.  It may or may not happen.

 

The best advice

still is to proceed with any pending transactions as if the June 30, 2010 closing date will remain final and binding.

 

NAR will continue lobbying the Senate to pass legislation similar to HR 5623.

 

We will continue to provide updates on this issue as they occur.

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 320 other followers